Ten opposition parliamentarians (MPs) were suspended for a day on Friday as a result of a chaotic session of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Waqf (Amendment Bill) 2024. Suspended MPs comprise prominent members of the Parliament like Kalyan Banerjee, Md Jawaid, A Raja, Asaduddin Owaisi, Nasir Hussain, Mohibullah, M Abdullah, Arvind Sawant, Nadimul Haq, and Imran Masood. The session degenerated into mayhem, charges and countercharges being flung from side to side across party lines.
The Controversy Unfolds
Opposition members alleged that the government rushed the Waqf (Amendment Bill) 2024 just to extract political mileage prior to the Assembly elections in Delhi. Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Kalyan Banerjee has heavily criticized the committee’s chairman, BJP MP Jagdambika Pal, for purportedly deliberately ignoring opposition views. The chairman doesn’t pay to anybody; it looks ‘zamindari’.This JPC has become a joke,”declared Banerjee, where the opposition are concerned about the process of the meeting.
Banerjee further alleged that the meeting’s agenda had been abruptly altered, preventing meaningful discussion. “We were informed that the meeting would proceed clause by clause, but the agenda was changed at the last minute. This feels like an undeclared emergency,” he said.
Concerns Over Waqf Properties
AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi also strongly objected, saying that the government prepared to abolish Waqf properties under the bill. “This Waqf bill is very delicate. Rushing it will have bad consequences. The government wants to destroy Waqf properties,” Owaisi warned. He also shared the bar and commented on the haste in the passage of the bill, but wanted more time to consider the consequences.
Reacting to the situation, the suspended MPs went to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla and sought postponement of the next JPC slated for January 27. They contended with modifications needed in order to be deliberative about the provisions in the bill and to foster equitable discussions.
Defensive Stance by the BJP
BJP MPs defended the suspensions, saying that the Opposition members had fouled the parliamentary decorum. Nishikant Dubey moved the motion for suspension, accusing the opposition of disrupting the JPC’s functioning. BJP MP Aparajita Sarangi described the behavior of opposition MPs as “disgusting,” citing their use of unparliamentary language.
Opposition party, with Kalyan Banerjee in the lead, hurled the most unbecoming words against JPC chairperson Jagdambika Pal, a veteran leader,” etc. We condemn this behavior. Although the meeting must go on, the JPC deliberations should not extend for ever. There has to be a conclusion,” commented Sarangi, explaining why the process needs to get going.
Previous Tensions Resurface
This is not the first meeting reviewed at JPC, JPC Waqf (Amendment Bill). In october previous year, when kalyan banerjee reportedly broke a glass bottle in an outburst with chairperson Jagdambika Pal, the tensions escalated. According to the report, the incident reportedly injured Banerjee and brought to light latent hostility between the two communities.
Disruptions on Friday also emphasize the unpredictability of the debate concerning the Waqf (Amendment Bill), which has led to a heated debate on the potential impact of Waqf properties and community rights.
The Larger Debate
The crux of the controversy is the opposition’s contention that the bill imperils the sacredness of Waqf lands, with cultural or religious value in the Muslim world. Opposition figures claim that more rapid government action to get the bill through is inherently an authoritarian move that disregards democratic processes and minorities’ rights.
The BJP, on the other hand, maintains that the opposition’s objections are baseless and politically motivated. Party leaders assert that the legislation is aimed at improving governance and transparency in managing Waqf properties.
The Path Ahead
A fractured tension in the parliamentary committee remains under the spotlight as the JPC heads to its next scheduled meeting. Suspended MPs are likely to increase their call for an impartial and open mechanism of discussion, whereas the governing party will push for a smooth and fast agreement.
The debate associated with the Waqf (Amendment Bill) illustrates the difficulty of traversing controversial legislative matters in a polarised political landscape. Whether the JPC will be able to achieve a degree of urgency and also inclusivity is still to be seen, ongoing discussion about Waqf disposals continues to bring passions to the boil on both political and communal fronts.
“Stay updated with the latest news and insights – follow us at YPBB News on X for real-time updates and exclusive stories!”
